Abstract
Objectives: Surgical management of spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging. There is no standard guideline regarding the timing of surgery, although physicians have prioritized early surgery over the past decades. Although better outcomes have been observed from these studies, the definition of early surgery has been controversial, although mostly limited to 24-hours after injury. For some hospitals, this early surgery could be difficult to implement in practice. Hence, we re-evaluated the timing of early surgery as surgery within 48 hours and investigated the surgical outcomes of SCI depending on whether surgery was performed early (≤48 hours) or late (>48 hours). The primary outcomes were improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade in early and late surgery groups.
Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study in individuals aged 15-85 years, who underwent surgery for SCI between 2005 and 2016. The rate of AIS grade improvements was measured at 6 months after injury. Of the 86 enrolled patients, 31 (mean, 40.9 ± 12.64 hours) and 55 (mean, 168.25 ± 93.01 hours) patients were assigned to the early and late surgery groups, respectively.
Results: AIS grade improvement was significantly greater in the early than in the late group (P = 0.039). In the early group, there was no significant difference in neurologic improvements among the AIS B, C, and D groups, but the AIS A group showed a significant improvement (P = 0.015). This finding was not observed in the late group (P = 0.060). AIS grade improvement was also significantly greater in the incomplete SCI group than in the complete SCI group, for all measurements (early, P = 0.007, late, P = 0.009). Other factors that significantly affected clinical outcomes were AIS grade on admission and the level of the injury.
Keywords: ASIA impairment scale; Spinal cord injury; Spine surgery; Surgery timing; Trauma.
Figure 3. Distribution of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade improvements between admission and 6 months after injury. (A) In the early surgery group, the marginal homogeneity test indicates a significant change over time (P < 0.0001). AIS grade improvement is only significantly different for AIS A compared with AIS D, as reference value (P = 0.015). No significant differences are observed for AIS B (P = 0.515) and C (P = 0.906). (B) In the late surgery group, the marginal homogeneity test indicates a significant change over time (P < 0.0001). However, the AIS grade improvement is not significantly different for all AIS grades.
Comments